Compiled account: A Schism in the Transmission
From a Letter to Kapilnath of 16 August 1985

Mahendranath’s 1985 letter clarifies no Uttara Kaula or Adi-Nath initiations, names Lokanath and Lalita as sole Western Nath initiators, and seeks harmony.

Mahendranath’s 1985 letter clarifies no Uttara Kaula or Adi-Nath initiations, names Lokanath and Lalita as sole Western Nath initiators, and seeks harmony.

Mahendranath’s 1985 letter clarifies INO’s initiation, names Lokanath and Lalita as sole initiates, and rejects Asian sadhu rules for Western Naths.

Mahendranath’s 1985 letter to Kapilnath laments Eric’s pseudo-initiation, clarifies no Uttara Kaula sadhu diksha given, and plans Ahmedabad trip.

Mahendranath’s 1987 letter to Kapilnath praises Phantastikos, suggests a newsletter, and introduces “Gurunath” title for Lokanath, noting US-UK Nath differences

Mahendranath’s 1987 letter to Kapilnath proposes renaming to International Nath Order, suggests a newsletter, and reflects on health and attainment goals.

Mahendranath’s 1988 letter to Kapilnath proposes a standard Nath initiation form, urges its distribution, and notes London’s unresponsiveness to Sweden’s Dan J.

Mahendranath’s 1988 letter to Kapilnath discusses INO expansion, Mike’s contradictions, and eye health, urging true attainment beyond conditioning.

Mahendranath’s 1988 letter to Kapilnath critiques Mike’s ego-driven errors, praises Seattle’s Nath festival, and urges sharing the authentic Initiation Rite.

Mahendranath’s 1988 letter to Kapilnath praises Seattle’s growing Nath power, likens it to Shambhala, and blesses their self-sufficient magickal progress.

Mahendranath’s 1989 letter to Kapilnath critiques Mike’s AMOOKOS confusion, proposes MAGIKOS for Americas, and urges focus on Nath guidelines.
Compiled account: A Schism in the Transmission